Specialist legal defense against patent infringement allegations and strategic enforcement of your intellectual property rights – before German patent courts and the Unified Patent Court (UPC)
Request Initial Consultation
Attorney Svetoslav Ivanov, LL.M.
Certified Specialist in Intellectual Property Law (Germany) | Master of Laws in Intellectual Property Law
Many medium-sized companies are suddenly confronted with patent infringement allegations – often without prior warning and with potentially devastating financial demands.
Typical situations in which clients contact me include:
The solution: Experienced specialized legal representation that protects you from unjustified claims, strategically challenges weak patents, and develops economically viable solutions.
As a Certified Specialist in Intellectual Property Law (Germany) with an LL.M. in Intellectual Property Law, I defend medium-sized companies nationwide against patent infringement allegations and strategically enforce your own intellectual property rights.
I thoroughly examine the allegations, analyze the technical and legal situation, and develop a tailored defense strategy – from rejecting unfounded claims to invalidity actions to negotiated settlements.
Many patents do not withstand legal and technical scrutiny. I attack weak patents through invalidity proceedings before the Federal Patent Court (Germany) or the UPC, creating freedom to operate for your business.
I represent clients throughout Germany before all patent litigation chambers, Higher Regional Courts (Germany), the Federal Patent Court (Germany), and the Unified Patent Court (UPC). Jurisdiction depends on patent type and litigation strategy.
Patent litigation is cost-intensive. I develop cost-efficient strategies with transparent budgeting that minimize litigation risk and favor out-of-court solutions where economically sensible. Binding fee estimates can only be provided after reviewing the mandate and the facts of the case.
Focus: Defense and Strategic Enforcement
Representation in infringement proceedings before all German patent litigation chambers (including Hamburg, Düsseldorf, Mannheim, Munich Regional Court (Germany)), Higher Regional Courts (Germany), and the Unified Patent Court (UPC) – both as claimant enforcing your rights and as defendant defending against claims.
Attacking weak patents through invalidity actions before the Federal Patent Court (Germany) or the UPC – parallel to infringement proceedings or preemptively. An appeal to the Federal Court of Justice is possible.
Legally sound assessment of whether your products or processes could infringe third-party patents – before market launch, during product development, or after receiving warning letters (FTO analysis). Identification of relevant IP rights and assessment of infringement risk.
Review of incoming warning letters, assessment of infringement allegations, and strategic response – from a modified cease-and-desist undertaking to rejection of the claims to a full defense against unfounded allegations.
Defense against unfounded patent infringement allegations – through technical and legal analysis, establishing non-use of the patent, inability to prove infringement, or challenging the validity of the patent itself.
Emergency proceedings in cases of acute infringement risk – both obtaining injunctions for rapid enforcement of your rights and defense, opposition, and having opposing injunctions lifted. Preventive protective letters to avoid injunctions without hearing.
Negotiation and legally sound drafting of license agreements – in response to infringement allegations, for use of third-party technologies, or for monetizing your own patents. Individual and cross-license agreements.
Development of IP strategies for your company – which patents make economic sense, how to minimize infringement risks, and what alternatives (e.g., utility models, trade secret protection) are available?
Advice on employer claims to employee inventions, compensation claims, and disputes between employers and inventive employees under the German Employee Inventions Act.
Note: I do not handle patent applications myself. If needed, I can refer you to specialized patent attorneys with whom I cooperate. They handle the technical preparation and filing of the application.
Structured approach to patent infringement allegations
In the first consultation (via video call, phone, or in person), I analyze the warning letter or complaint, provide an initial legal assessment of the facts, and explain your short-term options. When deadlines are running, I respond immediately once I have the relevant documents.
I examine the technical details of your product or process, compare it with the patent claims, and analyze whether infringement actually exists (claim mapping). In parallel, I assess the prospects of an invalidity action based on criteria such as novelty, inventive step, and disclosure – if necessary in cooperation with a patent attorney.
Together we develop a tailored defense strategy: from establishing non-use, to challenging the patent in invalidity proceedings, to negotiating a licensing solution. I provide a transparent assessment of costs, costs, the course of the proceedings, and risks – including the worst-case scenario.
Where economically sensible, I pursue out-of-court solutions – such as settlement negotiations, license agreements, or reasoned rejection of unjustified claims. This avoids time, costs, and litigation risks.
If necessary, I represent you nationwide before all competent patent litigation chambers, Higher Regional Courts (Germany), the Federal Patent Court (Germany), and the Unified Patent Court (UPC). I develop a clear litigation strategy, always with a focus on cost-effectiveness, proportionality, and results orientation.
Your advantages in working together
Certified Specialist in Intellectual Property Law (Germany) and Master of Laws (LL.M.) in Intellectual Property Law – solid technical and legal expertise in patent infringement proceedings.
I represent clients throughout Germany before all patent litigation chambers (including Hamburg, Düsseldorf, Mannheim, Munich), Higher Regional Courts (Germany), the Federal Patent Court (Germany), and the Unified Patent Court (UPC). Initial consultation via video call, phone, or in person.
Efficient processes, paperless file management, and fast response times – particularly important with short deadlines after warning letters, preliminary injunctions, or emergency proceedings.
Patent litigation must be economically justifiable. I develop cost-efficient strategies with transparent budgeting, minimize litigation risks, and seek pragmatic solutions – without unnecessary escalation.
Early grounding in the natural sciences through successful participation in mathematics and physics olympiads. Analytical foundation for understanding complex technical matters in patent law.
Several years of practice in patent litigation. Cases handled cover the full spectrum of patent litigation:
Practical experience with patent disputes in various technical fields:
Answers to the most important questions
Do not react hastily and do not sign any cease-and-desist undertaking without legal review. Have the warning letter reviewed immediately by a specialist attorney – I analyze the technical and legal allegations, assess the legal situation, and develop a defense strategy. Important: Pay attention to deadlines in the warning letter and respond in time to avoid a preliminary injunction.
Patent litigation can involve significant costs – particularly with higher amounts in dispute or complex proceedings. I inform you early about the expected attorney and court costs and develop a defense strategy that is economically viable.
Note: Specific fees are determined by the German Lawyers’ Remuneration Act (RVG) or a fee agreement – depending on the amount in dispute, scope, course of proceedings, and specific circumstances.
Yes. If you believe that a patent was wrongly granted – for example due to lack of novelty, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure – you can initiate invalidity proceedings.
For German patents, the Federal Patent Court (Germany) has jurisdiction. For European unitary patents, a “Revocation Action” can be brought before the Unified Patent Court (UPC) – with effect for all participating EU states.
Invalidity proceedings aim to challenge the validity of a patent – often in parallel with defense in infringement litigation. Success is achieved, among other things, when it can be demonstrated that the invention was already known at the time of filing or was not based on an inventive step.
A Freedom-to-Operate opinion (FTO) systematically examines whether your product or process infringes third-party patents. This is particularly important before market launches or during product development. The opinion identifies relevant patents through targeted research, analyzes infringement risks through claim mapping, and provides recommendations for action. An FTO opinion can help prevent expensive litigation and production disruptions.
No, at least not in the form presented by the opposing party. Cease-and-desist undertakings in warning letters are often overbroad and may impose lifelong obligations, broadly worded prohibitions, and high contractual penalties (often EUR 5,000 to 50,000 per violation). Have the declaration reviewed and modified by a specialist attorney (modified cease-and-desist undertaking). In many cases, complete defense is possible if the allegation is unfounded or the patent is weak.
In Germany, twelve Regional Courts have specialized patent litigation chambers, including Hamburg, Düsseldorf (with three chambers), Mannheim, and Munich. These have jurisdiction for infringement proceedings. Invalidity proceedings for German patents are heard exclusively before the Federal Patent Court (Germany) in Munich. Since June 2023, the Unified Patent Court (UPC) additionally has jurisdiction for European patents and unitary patents – in Germany there are four UPC local divisions (Hamburg, Düsseldorf, Mannheim, Munich). I represent you before all competent courts.
First-instance infringement proceedings before German patent litigation chambers are often decided within approximately 9 to 15 months. Invalidity proceedings before the Federal Patent Court (Germany) take on average about two years at first instance, depending particularly on the technical field and complexity of the case. Preliminary injunctions can be issued – if urgency is established – within a few days or weeks. Proceedings before the Unified Patent Court (UPC) have so far often been faster than national proceedings – with an average duration of approximately 12 months until judgment. Long-term experience with actual case durations is still limited.
In case of defeat, you must immediately cease the infringing activity, pay damages, provide information, and bear the litigation costs of both parties. Therefore, early risk analysis and a well-thought-out litigation strategy are crucial.
Yes. You can file an opposition against a preliminary injunction and request an oral hearing. There you can contest the infringement, challenge the validity of the patent, or question the urgency. In parallel, you can file a protective brief in advance to prevent preliminary injunctions without a hearing. The protective letter remains effective for six months and can be extended.
That depends on the individual case. Often an out-of-court solution is economically preferable. But if the allegation is unfounded, the patent is weak, or much is at stake economically, litigation can make sense. I analyze costs, risks, and prospects of success for your case.
The Unified Patent Court (UPC) has had jurisdiction since June 1, 2023 for infringement and invalidity proceedings regarding unitary patents as well as – in principle – also for conventional European patents, provided their holders have not filed an effective opt-out during the transitional period (currently 7 years).
With an effective opt-out, the jurisdiction of national courts (e.g., German patent litigation chambers and the Federal Patent Court (Germany)) remains in place. The key factors in determining jurisdiction are the patent type (German patent, European patent, unitary patent), any opt-out declaration, and the strategic orientation of the parties.
I assess for you before which court your case can or must be brought – and represent you before all competent courts, including the UPC.
Choose your preferred contact method – nationwide via video call, phone, or in person:
Your data will be treated confidentially, processed in accordance with the GDPR, and protected by attorney-client privilege.